Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Mark Lord wrote:So, the drive is rejecting an LBA48 WRITE operation, which should happenonly if the drive does not have LBA48 support. Now, I know you posted allof this nice info months ago, but let's see it again now, for the exactdrive that is generating that specific message. We need to see the outputfrom "hdparm --Istdout /dev/sdX" for that drive. ThanksHere it is: They are identical disks (the WD 400KD), both show up as 373GB (formatted):
Which *exact* unit generated the WRITE errors you posted about? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- References:
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 5/7] add user namespace
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] remove volatile from nmi.c
- Previous by thread: Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- Next by thread: Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- Index(es):
 |