On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Mark Lord wrote:
Justin Piszcz wrote:On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Mark Lord wrote:So, the drive is rejecting an LBA48 WRITE operation, which should happen only if the drive does not have LBA48 support. Now, I know you posted all of this nice info months ago, but let's see it again now, for the exact drive that is generating that specific message. We need to see the output from "hdparm --Istdout /dev/sdX" for that drive. ThanksHere it is: They are identical disks (the WD 400KD), both show up as 373GB (formatted):Which *exact* unit generated the WRITE errors you posted about?
Both have generated the errors, they are identical drives and firmware. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Prev by Date: Re: Kernel headers git tree
- Next by Date: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
- Previous by thread: Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- Next by thread: [ANNOUNCE] pnputils-0.1
- Index(es):