On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 11:11 +0200, dirk husemann wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >> so that it's as
> >> feature-rich as the other one.
> >>
> >
> > this is one of the things that bothers me.
> > "features features features"
> > lets first get the basics right and working.
> > Once we have that in tree for a release or two and it's really
> > reliable... THEN and only THEN work on adding features.
> >
> hmm...could it be that we "features, features, features" in suspend2
> because nigel & co did get the basics right?
As I said... if that is the case then it'd be easy to first merge "the
right basics", get that solid, and THEN add the features. So far I've
not seen that happen.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
