Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson

>  so that it's as
> feature-rich as the other one.

this is one of the things that bothers me.
"features features features"
lets first get the basics right and working.
Once we have that in tree for a release or two and it's really
reliable... THEN and only THEN work on adding features.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson
    • From: dirk husemann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] spinlocks: remove 'volatile'
• Next by Date: Re: fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c:xfs_readdir(): NULL variable dereferenced
• Previous by thread: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson
• Next by thread: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]