Re: [patch 2.6.18-rc1] genirq: {en,dis}able_irq_wake() need refcounting too

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:

> > we should also add disable_irq_wake() / enable_irq_wake() APIs and 
> > start migrating most ARM users over to the new APIs, agreed? That 
> > makes the APIs more symmetric and the code more readable too.
> 
> That _is_ the API anyway.  set_irq_wake() was never intended to be 
> called directly from drivers.

doh - right. So the patch is the right thing to do :-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux