On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 12:28 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> I think this is a real bug, well in fact there seem to be 2:
>
> there are 2 locks that have dodgy locking, one is a spinlock one is a
> rwlock. Both are used in softirq context, but neither had the proper _bh
> marking. The patch below corrects this
The patch has been working very well so far, and the informational error message has
not resurfaced over a couple of restarts.
Many thanks!
Arne
______________________________________________________________
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
