Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ar Sad, 2006-07-08 am 18:43 +0200, ysgrifennodd Olivier Galibert:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:41:58PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Very often, choice is good. but for something this fundamental, it is
> > not. We also don't have 2 scsi layers for example.
> 
> We have 2 ide layers, 2 usb-storage drivers, 2 sound systems and we

(We've had effectively two SCSI layers before now btw when we've done
transitions from old_eh to new_eh)

> have had 2 pcmcia subsystems and 2 usb subsystems.  At one point, it's
> the only way to find out what will work out.  Suspend2 and uswsusp
> have very different fundamental designs, and it's quite unclear at
> that point which one is the right one.

I'd like to see this cleared up at OLS/Kernel summit. 

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux