Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rohan Dhruva wrote:
Why not
take the best from both swsusp and suspend2, and get a nice
implementation into the kernel, that works most of the times !

Well, this is the ten thousand dollar question - why not indeed? Pavel says "Problems are in drivers, and drivers are shared", but suspend2 works around this by unloading certain drivers before suspending, and otherwise hacking around the difficulties. This is, I think, what is meant when suspend2 is said to support scripting. It may not be a pleasing approach from a theoretical standpoint, but it seems to be the only way to get a reliable implementation in a timely fashion -- reliable in the sense of being most likely to work on a randomly chosen machine without custom configuration.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux