Hi!
> >Why not
> >take the best from both swsusp and suspend2, and get a
> >nice
> >implementation into the kernel, that works most of the
> >times !
>
> Well, this is the ten thousand dollar question - why not
> indeed? Pavel says "Problems are in drivers, and
> drivers are shared", but suspend2 works around this by
> unloading certain drivers before suspending, and
> otherwise hacking around the difficulties. This is, I
> think, what is meant when suspend2 is said to support
> scripting.
Well, you do make same hacks with swsusp; powersaved does that for
example.
> It may not be a pleasing approach from a
> theoretical standpoint, but it seems to be the only way
...but as it is not pleasing, it can't go anywhere near mainline.
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
