* Randy.Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote: > > well the 'allyesconfig' isnt the true allyesconfig but one with most > > debugging options disabled. It is quite close to a typical distro config > > - hence very much relevant. (I wanted to use something that is easy to > > reproduce.) Believe me, for large configs the savings are real. > > I would expect distros to use something close to all*mod*config (with > some debug options disabled). that's the same as allyesconfig from an inlining cost POV. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- Prev by Date: Re: ACPIPNP and too large IO resources
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- Index(es):
 |