Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions

* Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > OK, but what happened to the 35-bytes-per-callsite saving?
> 
> I really don't think it existed.
> 
> Maybe there's something else going on. In particular, I wonder if 
> sections like the "debug_loc" fection end up being counted towards 
> text-size? They never actually get _loaded_, but they can be 
> absolutely enormous if CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO is enabled.

i had CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO (and UNWIND_INFO) disabled in all these build 
tests.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.4.33-rc2
• Next by Date: Re: ACPIPNP and too large IO resources
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]