* Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > OK, but what happened to the 35-bytes-per-callsite saving? > > I really don't think it existed. > > Maybe there's something else going on. In particular, I wonder if > sections like the "debug_loc" fection end up being counted towards > text-size? They never actually get _loaded_, but they can be > absolutely enormous if CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO is enabled. i had CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO (and UNWIND_INFO) disabled in all these build tests. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- References:
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.4.33-rc2
- Next by Date: Re: ACPIPNP and too large IO resources
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- Index(es):