On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:00:09 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Randy.Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > well, the allnoconfig thing is artificial (and the uninteresting) for a > > > number of reasons: > > > > hm, I'd have to say that allyesconfig is also artificial and the > > savings numbers are somewhat uninteresting in that case too. > > well the 'allyesconfig' isnt the true allyesconfig but one with most > debugging options disabled. It is quite close to a typical distro config > - hence very much relevant. (I wanted to use something that is easy to > reproduce.) Believe me, for large configs the savings are real. I would expect distros to use something close to all*mod*config (with some debug options disabled). --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- References:
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- Next by Date: Re: ext4 features
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
- Index(es):