Re: [PATCH] stop on cpu lost

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Čt 22-06-06 12:52:32, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >That's what I'd prefer... as swsusp uses cpu hotplug.
> 
> Does it have to?  I presume this has been considered before, but what if 
> the other CPUs were just idled for suspend rather than "removed"?

Basically yes, it has to. Idling cpus is easy, but bringing cpus back
up during resume is not, and we'd like to reuse cpu hotplug code.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux