Re: [PATCH] stop on cpu lost

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pavel Machek wrote:
That's what I'd prefer... as swsusp uses cpu hotplug.

Does it have to? I presume this has been considered before, but what if the other CPUs were just idled for suspend rather than "removed"? Or do you actually need to simulate a hot-remove to make sure they get suspended properly? In general, the "hot remove as suspend" thing seems semantically awkward.

   J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux