Hi!
> >remove infrastructure which would, for example, allow "ps" to show
> >such tasks. Perhaps such infrastructure should remain so long as
> >there are tasks there.
>
> They'll be in the global tasklist, so there should be no reason why
> they couldn't be migrated over to an online CPU with taskset. Shouldn't
> require any rewrites, IIRC.
>
> But after swsusp comes back up, it will be bringing up the same number
> of CPUs as went down, won't it? So you shouldn't get into that
> situation where you'd need to kill stuff, should you?
Well... unless something goes *very* wrong, we wake with same number
of CPUs. I've seen it fail in error cases (went to sleep with dual
cpus, but could not kick the second cpu to life during resume).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
