Re: Merge of per task delay accounting (was Re: 2.6.18 -mm merge plans)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shailabh Nagar wrote:
hm.  Is it possible to check the privileges of a netlink message sender?
Not entirely sure. But there's. a check in net/netlink/genetlink.c: genl_rcv_msg()
for
if ((ops->flags & GENL_ADMIN_PERM) && security_netlink_recv(skb))
{    err = -EPERM;
   goto errout;
}

and security_netlink_recv(skb), normally set to cap_netlink_recv, checks on the skb's effective capability
being CAP_NET_ADMIN which I thought would be sufficient.
Need to look further.

If it doesn't turn out to fit properly, sysfs config variable can be used.


The genl_ops has a flags field. If the flags field is initialized to
GENL_ADMIN_PERM, then privleges are checked as pointed out by you.

--

	Balbir Singh,
	Linux Technology Center,
	IBM Software Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux