Re: Merge of per task delay accounting (was Re: 2.6.18 -mm merge plans)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:28:15 -0400
Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]> wrote:

So, we have a good consensus from existing/potential users of taskstats and would
very much appreciate it being included in 2.6.18.

Yes, for 2.6.18 I'm inclined to send taskstats and to continue to play
wait-and-see on the statistics infrastructure.  Greg is taking a look at
the stats code, which is good.

Thanks !

The suggestion from Jay Lan to extend the interface by making sending of tgid stats configurable
is quite reasonable and can be done relatively simply:
set some parameter, either by sending a separate command (verify sender is privileged) or by some sysfs parameter and use that to control sending of tgid stats on task exit (as well as allocation of
any tgid stat related structures).

Would you recommend we submit a patch for it now or wait till after delay accounting has gone into
2.6.18 ?

Such requests for extending the interface are likely to happen as more users start using the interface. But since any patch will need some testing etc. and we are very close to the 2.6.18 merge window, I
wanted your advice on whether this should wait until later.

Regards,
Shailabh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux