Re: [PATCH] readahead: initial method - expected read size - fix fastcall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:28:02AM +0200, Voluspa wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 16:13:52 +0800 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > It's interesting that copying of sparse file is more efficient with small
> > readahead size :) I get the same conclusion, though with smaller differences:
> 
> How on earth can you copy the file without overwriting the target /dev/null?

Yes, it worked as expected. All the time.

I'm running zsh, though bash is also tested ok.

% cp --version
cp (GNU coreutils) 5.96
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Wu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux