On Fri, Jun 02 2006, zhao, forrest wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 08:03 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01 2006, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > >It's a lot more complicated than that, I'm afraid. ahci doesn't even
> > > >have the resume/suspend methods defined, plus it needs more work than
> > > >piix on resume.
> > > >
> > > Hannes Reinecke's patch implements those functions, basically by
> > > factoring out the shutdown and init code and calling them at
> > > suspend/resume time as well.
> > >
> > > Is that correct/sufficient? Or should something else be happening?
> >
> > No that's it, I know for a fact that suspend/resume works perfectly with
> > the 10.1 suse kernel. You can give that a shot, if you want.
>
> You may mean the Hannes's patch for 10.1 SUSE kernel. Hannes's patch
> posted in open source community(or in linux-ide mailing list) didn't
> work.
I didn't say Hannes patch, I said I know that 10.1 works. And that is
probably in large due to the patch that Hannes did, which implents
resume/suspend and takes care of reinitializing the resources.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
