zhao, forrest wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 13:19 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> It's a lot more complicated than that, I'm afraid. ahci doesn't even
>>> have the resume/suspend methods defined, plus it needs more work than
>>> piix on resume.
>>>
>> Hannes Reinecke's patch implements those functions, basically by
>> factoring out the shutdown and init code and calling them at
>> suspend/resume time as well.
>>
>> Is that correct/sufficient? Or should something else be happening?
>
> According to our test of Hannes's patch, it's not sufficient to support
> AHCI suspend/resume.
>
> Now I'm writing a patch to try to provide complete support for AHCI
> suspend/resume and will send out patch soon, hopefully by the end of
> today.
>
Can I have details, please? What doesn't work?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke [email protected]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH S390 & zSeries
Maxfeldstraße 5 +49 911 74053 688
90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
