Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 02 June 2006 04:34, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:15:47 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> Without specifying a design here are a few requirements I would have:
> >>
> >> 1) The kernel subsystem should be agnostic of the display server. The
> >> solution should not be X specific. Any display system should be able
> >> to use it, SDL, Y Windows, Fresco, etc...
> >
> > of course, but that doesn't mean it can't re-use X's code, they are
> > the best drivers we have. you forget everytime that the kernel fbdev
> > drivers aren't even close, I mean not by a long long way apart from
> > maybe radeon.
>
> matroxfb is clearly better than the X driver. atyfb too IMO.

Hopefully the work me, Dave and Tony are doing is going to make it a level 
field. If it still doesn't improve things you are still free to use the fbcon 
system. THat's one part of the design that will not change.

DRH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux