Re: State of resume for AHCI?

zhao, forrest wrote:

According to our test of Hannes's patch, it's not sufficient to support
AHCI suspend/resume.

Yes.  I merged it into mm2, and it didn't make any difference.

Now I'm writing a patch to try to provide complete support for AHCI
suspend/resume and will send out patch soon, hopefully by the end of
today.

Great, looking forward to it.

   J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • State of resume for AHCI?
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: State of resume for AHCI?
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: State of resume for AHCI?
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: State of resume for AHCI?
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: State of resume for AHCI?
    • From: "zhao, forrest" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC] smt nice introduces significant lock contention
• Previous by thread: Re: State of resume for AHCI?
• Next by thread: Re: State of resume for AHCI?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]