Re: [rfc][patch] remove racy sync_page?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Piggin wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:

Tell me WHERE you can unplug in that sequence. I will tell you where you can NOT unplug:


...

- you can NOT just unplug in the path _after_ "readpage()", because the IO may have been started by SOMEBODY ELSE that just did read-ahead, and didn't unplug (on _purpose_ - the whole point of doing read-ahead is to allow concurrent IO execution, so a read-aheader that unplugs is broken by definition)


Umm, this happens with the current lock_page() after readpage. And
with per-task plugs, you do not unplug anybody else.

If this wasn't clear: I don't mean per-task plugs as in "the task
explicitly plugs and unplugs the block device"[*]; I mean really
per-task plugs.

[*] That would be crazy anyway because that would imply some random
    task can plug an filled request queue that is going full tilt.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux