Re: [rfc][patch] remove racy sync_page?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 30 May 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> I guess so. Is plugging still needed now that the IO layer should
> get larger requests?

Why do you think the IO layer should get larger requests?

I really don't understand why people dislike plugging. It's obviously 
superior to non-plugged variants, exactly because it starts the IO only 
when _needed_, not at some random "IO request feeding point" boundary.

In other words, plugging works _correctly_ regardless of any random 
up-stream patterns. That's the kind of algorithms we want, we do NOT want 
to have the IO layer depend on upstream always doing the "Right 
Thing(tm)".

So exactly why would you want to remove it?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux