Anssi Hannula <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> >>>It would be much nicer all round if we could avoid renaming this file.
> >>
> >>Indeed... There are these 4 options as far as I see:
> >>
> >>1. Do this rename
> >>2. Put all the code in input-ff.c to input.c
> >>3. Make the input-ff a separate bool "module" and add
> >>EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() for input_ff_event() which is currently the only
> >>function in input-ff.c that is called from input.c
> >>4. Rename the input "module" to something else, it doesn't matter so
> >>much as almost everybody builds it as built-in anyway.
> >>
> >>WDYT is the best one?
> >
> >
> > I still don't know what problem you're trying to solve so I cannot say.
>
> Maybe you know now.
yup, thanks.
I'd have thought that 3) is the path of least resistance.
But it does require that input.c "knows" that input-ff.c was included in
the build, which is not a thing we like to do.
Why should things in input.c call into input-ff.c, btw? The way we
normally would handle that is to add a register_something() API to input.c
and input-ff.c would insert its callback via that interface.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]