Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 1/6] Base support for kmemleak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Also, kmemleak guarantees (assuming the implementation is correct) that 
> if a leak happens in practice, it will be detected immediately. 
> Coverity, being a static analyzer, wont find leaks that are obscured by 
> some sort of complex codepath.

A good example is the skb allocation/freeing. I'm not sure Coverity is
able to track the code path in a protocol stack. I'll modify a network
driver to "forget" some skb freeing and test the kmemleak detection.

Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux