Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
[...]
would also pick up the ability to reset secondary cards at boot.

But if you think the kernel will grow an x86 emulator, you're dreaming. That's what initramfs and friends are for.

I really don't want to push the x86 emulator idea, especially when kernel gurus that I respect very much, such as yourself, seem to be against it.

It just seems awkward that everyone thinks its fine to have a 30Kb ACPI interpreter in the kernel that loads a DSDT and executes it, but a 30Kb x86 emulator that loads a video ROM and executes it is completely absurd.

Some PC's need an ACPI interpreter to function properly, some video cards need a x86 emulator to function properly.

Why is everyone so keen on keeping the video drivers crippled, but no one says "ACPI should be done from user space with user mode helpers"?

--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com

Pointy-Haired Boss: I don't see anything that could stand in our way.
           Dilbert: Sanity? Reality? The laws of physics?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux