At 02:57 PM Friday 5/5/2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Okay, let me ask this:
If the *kernel* limit is modified, but the LILO limit is not, what will happen? This is the real crux of the matter.
The length of the kernel command line will be limited by the size of the boot loader buffer. LILO always inserts a NUL terminator.
--JohnP.S. The LILO command line buffer has always been 1 sector (512 bytes); however, only the first half is actually used for the command line. No kernel can do any harm by setting "boot_cmdline[511] = 0;" for any version of LILO back to version 20 (and probably before).
PGP KeyID: 6781C9C8 (good until 31-Dec-2008) Keyserver at ldap://keyserver.pgp.com OR http://pgp.mit.edu LILO links at http://freshmeat.net/projects/lilo and Help link at http://lilo.go.dyndns.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- References:
- [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: John Coffman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: John Coffman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] New version of shared page tables
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] netdev: create attribute_groups with class_device_add
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- Index(es):