Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 07:09:22 -0700
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>, "Barry K. Nathan" <[email protected]>, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313)

Alon Bar-Lev wrote:

Revert "x86_64/i386: increase command line size" patch
It's a bootup dependancy, you can't just increase it
randomly, and it breaks booting with LILO.
Pointed out by Janos Farkas and Adrian Bunk.

Can we get the details, please, instead of a repeat of the same patch,so we can figure out a proper solution?


	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
  - From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
  - From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Move various PCI IDs to header file
Next by Date: Re: TCP/IP send, sendfile, RAW
Previous by thread: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux