Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit

Alon Bar-Lev wrote:

Revert "x86_64/i386: increase command line size" patch
It's a bootup dependancy, you can't just increase it
randomly, and it breaks booting with LILO.
Pointed out by Janos Farkas and Adrian Bunk.

Can we get the details, please, instead of a repeat of the same patch, so we can figure out a proper solution?

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
    • From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
    • From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Move various PCI IDs to header file
• Next by Date: Re: TCP/IP send, sendfile, RAW
• Previous by thread: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]