* Bob Picco <[email protected]> wrote: > Dave Hansen wrote: [Thu May 04 2006, 11:21:06AM EDT] > > I haven't thought through it completely, but these two lines worry me: > > > > > + start = pgdat->node_start_pfn & ~((1 << (MAX_ORDER - 1)) - 1); > > > + end = start + pgdat->node_spanned_pages; > > > > Should the "end" be based off of the original "start", or the aligned > > "start"? > > Yes. I failed to quilt refresh before sending. You mean end should be > end = pgdat->node_start_pfn + pgdat->node_spanned_pages before > rounding up. do you have an updated patch i should try? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- From: "Bob Picco" <[email protected]>
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- References:
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- From: "Bob Picco" <[email protected]>
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- From: "Bob Picco" <[email protected]>
- Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- Prev by Date: Re: Remove silly messages from input layer.
- Next by Date: RE: Remove silly messages from input layer.
- Previous by thread: Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- Next by thread: Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
- Index(es):