Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin J. Bligh wrote:
Oh that's a 32bit kernel. I don't think the 32bit NUMA has ever worked
anywhere but some Summit systems (at least every time I tried it it blew up on me and nobody seems to use it regularly). Maybe it would be finally time to mark it CONFIG_BROKEN though or just remove it (even by design it doesn't work very well)


Bollocks. It works fine, and is tested every single day, on every git
release, and every -mm tree.

Whatever the case, there definitely does not appear to be sufficient
zone alignment enforced for the buddy allocator. I cannot see how it
could work if zones are not aligned on 4MB boundaries.

Maybe some architectures / subarch code naturally does this for us,
but Ingo is definitely hitting this bug because his config does not
(align, that is).

I've randomly added a couple more cc's.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux