Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 16:02, Martin J. Bligh wrote:

Oh that's a 32bit kernel. I don't think the 32bit NUMA has ever worked
anywhere but some Summit systems (at least every time I tried it it blew up on me and nobody seems to use it regularly). Maybe it would be finally time to mark it CONFIG_BROKEN though or just remove it (even by design it doesn't work very well)

Bollocks. It works fine,

On what kind of box? Some summit system, right?

Summit and NUMA-Q, ie everything we originally created it for.

Well, it doesn't work for Ingo clearly. My own experiences every time
I tried it were similar.

What platform?

I think I stand by my original statement.

If it works fine on some platforms and not on others, I would venture to
suggest it's a platform-specific issue, and marking the whole thing as
CONFIG_BROKEN would be an entirely inappropriate overreaction to what
is probably a simple bug.

M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux