Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:04:23PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
BTW, C++ could take over some of sparse's function:
And the point of that would be? sparse is _fast_ and easy to modify;
g++ is neither.
I wasn't talking about modifying gcc to do the checking, rather using
language features so that the checks would happen during a regular
compile. That would mean we weren't dependent on somebody running sparse
with a configuration that triggers the bug, but those few who compile
the code before submitting the patch would get it automatically checked.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
