Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/6] UML - Small patches for 2.6.17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Blaisorblade <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Unless one considers 
>  > UML coding style to be a bug, which is an attractive idea ;)
> 
>  Well, we're slowly working on that... very slowly... I've thought multiple 
>  times to at least run Lindent on arch/um but I've not spoken up because of 
>  all the conflicts we (me and Jeff) would get with patches in our queues.

Lindent doesn't do a terribly good job, and one ends up having to perform a
lot of manual fixups.  Perhaps as many as are presently needed.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux