On Saturday 29 April 2006 01:55, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Dike <[email protected]> wrote:
> > These patches are 2.6.17 material.
>
> "remove NULL checks and add some CodingStyle" isn't.
Being restrictive is ok, but keeping patches in queues for longer than needed
creates more headaches than it solves, in my experience.
> Unless one considers
> UML coding style to be a bug, which is an attractive idea ;)
Well, we're slowly working on that... very slowly... I've thought multiple
times to at least run Lindent on arch/um but I've not spoken up because of
all the conflicts we (me and Jeff) would get with patches in our queues.
However, there are occasions in which we get conflicts anyway for other
reorganization, and in that case Lindent would be useful. Ok Jeff? I'm
speaking for instance about moving to os-Linux and such.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
