Re: [PATCH 0/6] UML - Small patches for 2.6.17

Jeff Dike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> These patches are 2.6.17 material.

"remove NULL checks and add some CodingStyle" isn't.  Unless one considers
UML coding style to be a bug, which is an attractive idea ;)

So I gave that one an extra-special look - I'll push it along, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/6] UML - Small patches for 2.6.17
  - From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/6] UML - Small patches for 2.6.17
  - From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2 - notifier chain problem?
Next by Date: Re: Linux I/O scheduling - ionice & co
Previous by thread: [PATCH 0/6] UML - Small patches for 2.6.17
Next by thread: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/6] UML - Small patches for 2.6.17
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]