On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:20:30PM +0800, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> If this is good one and the places where Al Viro pointed out really affect
> performance, should we propagate this faster one by introducing helper
> function like:
>
> static inline int refcount_test(atomic_t *refcount)
> {
> return (atomic_read(refcount) == 1) || (atomic_dec_and_test(refcount));
> }
>
> and replace atomic_dec_and_test with it?
No. It's obviously slower than atomic_dec_and_test() if refcount is
greater than 1. And I'm less than sure that you can show that benefits
in case when it is 1 outweight that. Moreover, for dentries, inodes,
superblocks and vfsmounts you'd have to pull spin_lock() in front of
it, which would _definitely_ hurt (these are atomic_dec_and_lock()).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
