>
>So although it's a simplistic benchmark where OS tuning may not provide as
>much benefit as JVM tuning, it still doesn't explain why Solaris is ~15% higher
>than Linux on the same hardware and JVM (I'm guessing that the tester did
>not spend as much time tuning Linux as they did Solaris, hence the question).
>
Have you ever seen a manufacturer not putting his product at the top?
When Microsoft folks make case studies about Linux+Windows, they come to
the conclusion that Windows is better.
When Linux folks make case studies about Linux+Windows, they come to the
conclusion that Linux is better.
Accordingly, a random benchmark picked from the web
(http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/x2100/) shows Solaris at the top.
And it's not surprisingly in general that a lot of manufacturers from any
industry claim they're world-leading in fact they are clearly competing
at the same level with a dozen other ones.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
