On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 21:00 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > > - int is_continuous;
> >
> > This field was introduced to have a clear property description. The
> > rating field might be used for this, but from a given rating on a
> > particular CPU architecture it might be hard to deduce whether this
> > clock source is good enough so we can switch to high resolution timer
> > mode.
>
> Currently this field isn't needed and as soon we have a need for it, we
> can add proper capability information.
Is there a reason, why requirements which are known from existing
experience must be discarded to be reintroduced later ?
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
