Re: [PATCH] Fix pciehp driver on non ACPI systems

On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 11:27 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Would that solve this issue?  I'm guessing that they are being included
> as it needs something in those headers... 

There's another #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI area in the .c file.  I doubt
anything else in there really needs ACPI.  Maybe the #ifdef'd area could
go into its own _acpi.c file?

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Fix pciehp driver on non ACPI systems
    • From: Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix pciehp driver on non ACPI systems
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix pciehp driver on non ACPI systems
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix pciehp driver on non ACPI systems
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] generic clocksource updates
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] generic clocksource updates
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix pciehp driver on non ACPI systems
• Next by thread: [BUG NET/PCMCIA 2.6.17-rc1] Oops with cardctl eject
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]