Hi,
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Currently this field isn't needed and as soon we have a need for it, we
> > can add proper capability information.
>
> Is there a reason, why requirements which are known from existing
> experience must be discarded to be reintroduced later ?
Then please explain these requirements.
This field shouldn't have been added in first place, I guess I managed to
confuse John when I talked about handling of continuous vs. tick based
clocks. Currently no user should even care about this, it's an
implementation detail of the clock.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
