On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:41:13AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:05:27 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:17:31PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > >
> > > Wrap some ACPI specific headers. ACPI hasnt taken over the whole world yet.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Index: kernel/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- kernel.orig/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c 2006-04-06 05:01:32.000000000 -0500
> > > +++ kernel/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c 2006-04-06 05:09:48.501122395 -0500
> > > @@ -38,10 +38,14 @@
> > >
> > > #include "../pci.h"
> > > #include "pciehp.h"
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > > #include <acpi/acpi.h>
> > > #include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
> > > #include <acpi/actypes.h>
> > > #include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Shouldn't the ACPI headers handle it if CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled? All
> > other header files work that way, and we shouldn't have to add this to
> > the .c files.
>
> maybe the C file could just #include <linux/acpi.h> ?
Would that solve this issue? I'm guessing that they are being included
as it needs something in those headers...
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
