On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 08:15:22AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 00:58 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 01:23:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > They are the same "delete devfs" patches that I submitted for 2.6.12 and
> > > 2.6.13 and 2.6.14 and 2.6.15. It rips out all of devfs from the kernel
> > > and ends up saving a lot of space. Since 2.6.13 came out, I have seen
> > > no complaints about the fact that devfs was not able to be enabled
> > > anymore, and in fact, a lot of different subsystems have already been
> > > deleting devfs support for a while now, with apparently no complaints
> > > (due to the lack of users.)
> >
> > I'm an occasional user. I'm just able to add a config entry by hand.
> >
> > Devfs for block devices is required for the fedora core 3 install
> > kernel.
>
> that is not true; Fedora Core 3 does not even have devfs enabled, and
> neither RHL nor FC has shipped devfsd like forever
>
> FC3 uses udev
The _install_ kernel does not use udev. It uses a mix of static /dev
and whatever it is which creates the block devices, but after checking
is not devfs after all, sorry about the mistake.
OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
