On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 08:07:09AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 01:13:36AM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:00:38PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > platform_get_irq*() cannot return 0 on error as 0 is a valid IRQ on some
> > > platforms, return -ENXIO instead.
> >
> > 0 is NO_IRQ, and can not be a valid IRQ number, ever. A
> > platform_get_irq*() returning 0 as a valid irq is buggy.
> >
> > Check http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/211
>
> No. That's Linus' _opinion_, which is not applicable to systems without
> the obviously broken PCI or ISA busses. On such systems, IRQ0 has no
> special meaning what so ever.
Do the drivers know?
OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
