Re: [PATCH] for_each_possible_cpu [1/19] defines for_each_possible_cpu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

for_each_cpu has always meant for
each possible CPU.


That was the most long-winded ack I've ever seen ;)


Is not! :). This is the very reason why I think it is pointless churn.
There are plenty of functions (even static, confined to a single file,
or ones much more complex than this) which could unquestionably have
their names changed for the better.

This change doesn't even add anything except a redundant element so
it is even questionable that it makes the name better at all.

But I know you've got your heart set on them now so I won't continue
with the impossible task of talking you out of them ;) Just don't
expect that people will suddenly start getting hotplug-cpu races
right, overnight.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux