Re: [PATCH] for_each_possible_cpu [1/19] defines for_each_possible_cpu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:43:38 +1100
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> The only places where things might care is arch bootup code, but
> the cpu interface is such that the arch code is expected to _hide_
> any weird details from these generic interfaces.
> 
Please see i386 patch. it contains BUG fix.
cpu_msrs[i].coutners are allocated by for_each_online_cpu().
and free it by for_each_possible_cpus() without no pointer check.

I think this kind of confusion will be seen again in future.
--Kame
--
 static void free_msrs(void)
 {
        int i;
-       for_each_cpu(i) {
-               kfree(cpu_msrs[i].counters);
+       for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+               if (cpu_msrs[i].counters)
+                       kfree(cpu_msrs[i].counters);
                cpu_msrs[i].counters = NULL;
-               kfree(cpu_msrs[i].controls);
+               if (cpu_msrs[i].controls)
+                       kfree(cpu_msrs[i].controls);
                cpu_msrs[i].controls = NULL;
        }
 }
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux