Re: [PATCH] for_each_possible_cpu [1/19] defines for_each_possible_cpu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:24:25 +1100
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

I'm sure that renaming for_each_cpu would not prevent that either.



But maintainers can check easily whether online or possible should be,
when they received a patch which includes for_each_cpu().


The submitter of the patch should have already thought of that
regardless of the name of the function. Everybody should be on
the same page anyway because for_each_cpu has always meant for
each possible CPU.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux