KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:24:25 +1100
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm sure that renaming for_each_cpu would not prevent that either.
But maintainers can check easily whether online or possible should be,
when they received a patch which includes for_each_cpu().
The submitter of the patch should have already thought of that
regardless of the name of the function. Everybody should be on
the same page anyway because for_each_cpu has always meant for
each possible CPU.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
