Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rik van Riel wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Zachary Amsden wrote:

About performance - I actually believe that it is possible to implement VMI Linux in such a way that it actually has _better_ performance on Xen than the current XenoLinux kernels.

How would VMI allow page table batching at fault time?
(one of the future optimizations that are probably worth
making for Xen)

This is exactly what we do. All page table transitions from P->NP or P->P already require a flushing call (FlushTLB or InvalPage). The remaining transitions, NP->P require explicit flushing, and we have added the appropriate call sites to do so. It turns out, the external MMU cache on Sparc provided exactly the required hook point in this case - update_mmu_cache().

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux