Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Zachary Amsden wrote:

> About performance - I actually believe that it is possible to implement 
> VMI Linux in such a way that it actually has _better_ performance on Xen 
> than the current XenoLinux kernels.

How would VMI allow page table batching at fault time?
(one of the future optimizations that are probably worth
making for Xen)

-- 
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
    • From: Anthony Liguori <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]