At Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:33:50 -0800,
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 12:05 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:53:41 -0500,
> > Lee Revell wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 19:39 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 22:31 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Older ALSA with a newer kernel has never been supported. Why would you
> > > > > want to replace the ALSA in the kernel with an old version?
> > > >
> > > > Because it is not an older version?
> > > > "cat /proc/asound/version" for the 2.6.15 in kernel tree prints this:
> > > > Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.10rc3
> > > > That should be older than 1.0.10 final.
> > >
> > > Ah, sorry. Then you're right, this patch must have slipped through the
> > > cracks.
> >
> > Well, ALSA 1.0.10-final was already released in last November,
> > i.e. before 2.6.15. When 2.6.15 was released, we had ALSA 1.0.11rc2.
>
> I understand. Still, 2.6.15 has 1.0.10rc3 and current alsa "stable" does
> not work out of the box with it (at least for some of the cards and in
> my tests - hmmm, maybe this only happens when running with the -rt
> patches?).
I hoped to release 1.0.11-final much ealier to make it available for
2.6.15 kernel, but it's delayed quite much, so far.
The current release-cycle is really really bad...
Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
- Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
- Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
- Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
- Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
- Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels)
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]